| Dimension | Shared | Only in A | Only in B | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sections | 0 | 1 | 14 | 0% |
| Commands | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Section tags | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0% |
What each file covers
Sections
0 shared · 1 only in A · 14 only in B- − 功能实现工作流
- + Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
- + Core Principles
- + Available Agents
- + Agent Orchestration
- + Security Guidelines
- + Coding Style
- + Testing Requirements
- + Development Workflow
- + Workflow Surface Policy
- + Git Workflow
- + Architecture Patterns
- + Performance
- + Project Structure
- + Success Metrics
Commands
0 shared · 2 only in A · 0 only in B- − gh search repos
- − gh search code
Section tags
0 shared · 0 only in A · 8 only in B- + build
- + test
- + code-style
- + architecture
- + git-pr
- + security
- + performance
- + agent-behaviour
Line diff
ThanhTrunggDEV/DontBeLazy · .cursor/rules/zh-development-workflow.mdc
@@ −1 @@
1# 开发工作流
2
3> 此文件扩展 [common/git-workflow.md](./git-workflow.md)，包含 git 操作之前的完整功能开发流程。
4
5功能实现工作流描述了开发管道：研究、规划、TDD、代码审查，然后提交到 git。
6
7## 功能实现工作流
8
90. **研究与重用** _(任何新实现前必需)_
10 - **GitHub 代码搜索优先：** 在编写任何新代码之前，运行 `gh search repos` 和 `gh search code` 查找现有实现、模板和模式。
11 - **库文档其次：** 使用 Context7 或主要供应商文档确认 API 行为、包使用和版本特定细节。
12 - **仅当前两者不足时使用 Exa：** 在 GitHub 搜索和主要文档之后，使用 Exa 进行更广泛的网络研究或发现。
13 - **检查包注册表：** 在编写工具代码之前搜索 npm、PyPI、crates.io 和其他注册表。首选久经考验的库而非手工编写的解决方案。
14 - **搜索可适配的实现：** 寻找解决问题 80%+ 且可以分支、移植或包装的开源项目。
15 - 当满足需求时，优先采用或移植经验证的方法而非从头编写新代码。
16
171. **先规划**
18 - 使用 **planner** 代理创建实现计划
19 - 编码前生成规划文档：PRD、架构、系统设计、技术文档、任务列表
20 - 识别依赖和风险
21 - 分解为阶段
22
232. **TDD 方法**
24 - 使用 **tdd-guide** 代理
25 - 先写测试（RED）
26 - 实现以通过测试（GREEN）
27 - 重构（IMPROVE）
28 - 验证 80%+ 覆盖率
29
303. **代码审查**
31 - 编写代码后立即使用 **code-reviewer** 代理
32 - 解决关键和高优先级问题
33 - 尽可能修复中优先级问题
34
354. **提交与推送**
36 - 详细的提交消息
37 - 遵循约定式提交格式
38 - 参见 [git-workflow.md](./git-workflow.md) 了解提交消息格式和 PR 流程
39
405. **审查前检查**
41 - 验证所有自动化检查（CI/CD）已通过
42 - 解决任何合并冲突
43 - 确保分支已与目标分支同步
44 - 仅在这些检查通过后请求审查
45
ThanhTrunggDEV/DontBeLazy · .cursor/AGENTS.md
@@ +1 @@
1# Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
2
3This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 48 specialized agents, 183 skills, 79 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.
4
5**Version:** 1.10.0
6
7## Core Principles
8
91. **Agent-First** — Delegate to specialized agents for domain tasks
102. **Test-Driven** — Write tests before implementation, 80%+ coverage required
113. **Security-First** — Never compromise on security; validate all inputs
124. **Immutability** — Always create new objects, never mutate existing ones
135. **Plan Before Execute** — Plan complex features before writing code
14
15## Available Agents
16
17| Agent | Purpose | When to Use |
18|-------|---------|-------------|
19| planner | Implementation planning | Complex features, refactoring |
20| architect | System design and scalability | Architectural decisions |
21| tdd-guide | Test-driven development | New features, bug fixes |
22| code-reviewer | Code quality and maintainability | After writing/modifying code |
23| security-reviewer | Vulnerability detection | Before commits, sensitive code |
24| build-error-resolver | Fix build/type errors | When build fails |
25| e2e-runner | End-to-end Playwright testing | Critical user flows |
26| refactor-cleaner | Dead code cleanup | Code maintenance |
27| doc-updater | Documentation and codemaps | Updating docs |
28| cpp-reviewer | C/C++ code review | C and C++ projects |
29| cpp-build-resolver | C/C++ build errors | C and C++ build failures |
30| docs-lookup | Documentation lookup via Context7 | API/docs questions |
31| go-reviewer | Go code review | Go projects |
32| go-build-resolver | Go build errors | Go build failures |
33| kotlin-reviewer | Kotlin code review | Kotlin/Android/KMP projects |
34| kotlin-build-resolver | Kotlin/Gradle build errors | Kotlin build failures |
35| database-reviewer | PostgreSQL/Supabase specialist | Schema design, query optimization |
36| python-reviewer | Python code review | Python projects |
37| java-reviewer | Java and Spring Boot code review | Java/Spring Boot projects |
38| java-build-resolver | Java/Maven/Gradle build errors | Java build failures |
39| loop-operator | Autonomous loop execution | Run loops safely, monitor stalls, intervene |
40| harness-optimizer | Harness config tuning | Reliability, cost, throughput |
41| rust-reviewer | Rust code review | Rust projects |
42| rust-build-resolver | Rust build errors | Rust build failures |
43| pytorch-build-resolver | PyTorch runtime/CUDA/training errors | PyTorch build/training failures |
44| typescript-reviewer | TypeScript/JavaScript code review | TypeScript/JavaScript projects |
45
46## Agent Orchestration
47
48Use agents proactively without user prompt:
49- Complex feature requests → **planner**
50- Code just written/modified → **code-reviewer**
51- Bug fix or new feature → **tdd-guide**
52- Architectural decision → **architect**
53- Security-sensitive code → **security-reviewer**
54- Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → **loop-operator**
55- Harness config reliability and cost → **harness-optimizer**
56
57Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.
58
59## Security Guidelines
60
61**Before ANY commit:**
62- No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
63- All user inputs validated
64- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
65- XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
66- CSRF protection enabled
67- Authentication/authorization verified
68- Rate limiting on all endpoints
69- Error messages don't leak sensitive data
70
71**Secret management:** NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager. Validate required secrets at startup. Rotate any exposed secrets immediately.
72
73**If security issue found:** STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar issues.
74
75## Coding Style
76
77**Immutability (CRITICAL):** Always create new objects, never mutate. Return new copies with changes applied.
78
79**File organization:** Many small files over few large ones. 200-400 lines typical, 800 max. Organize by feature/domain, not by type. High cohesion, low coupling.
80
81**Error handling:** Handle errors at every level. Provide user-friendly messages in UI code. Log detailed context server-side. Never silently swallow errors.
82
83**Input validation:** Validate all user input at system boundaries. Use schema-based validation. Fail fast with clear messages. Never trust external data.
84
85**Code quality checklist:**
86- Functions small (<50 lines), files focused (<800 lines)
87- No deep nesting (>4 levels)
88- Proper error handling, no hardcoded values
89- Readable, well-named identifiers
90
91## Testing Requirements
92
93**Minimum coverage: 80%**
94
95Test types (all required):
961. **Unit tests** — Individual functions, utilities, components
972. **Integration tests** — API endpoints, database operations
983. **E2E tests** — Critical user flows
99
100**TDD workflow (mandatory):**
1011. Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
1022. Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
1033. Refactor (IMPROVE) — verify coverage 80%+
104
105Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementation (not tests, unless tests are wrong).
106
107## Development Workflow
108
1091. **Plan** — Use planner agent, identify dependencies and risks, break into phases
1102. **TDD** — Use tdd-guide agent, write tests first, implement, refactor
1113. **Review** — Use code-reviewer agent immediately, address CRITICAL/HIGH issues
1124. **Capture knowledge in the right place**
113 - Personal debugging notes, preferences, and temporary context → auto memory
114 - Team/project knowledge (architecture decisions, API changes, runbooks) → the project's existing docs structure
115 - If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
116 - If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
1175. **Commit** — Conventional commits format, comprehensive PR summaries
118
119## Workflow Surface Policy
120
121- `skills/` is the canonical workflow surface.
122- New workflow contributions should land in `skills/` first.
123- `commands/` is a legacy slash-entry compatibility surface and should only be added or updated when a shim is still required for migration or cross-harness parity.
124
125## Git Workflow
126
127**Commit format:** `<type>: <description>` — Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci
128
129**PR workflow:** Analyze full commit history → draft comprehensive summary → include test plan → push with `-u` flag.
130
131## Architecture Patterns
132
133**API response format:** Consistent envelope with success indicator, data payload, error message, and pagination metadata.
134
135**Repository pattern:** Encapsulate data access behind standard interface (findAll, findById, create, update, delete). Business logic depends on abstract interface, not storage mechanism.
136
137**Skeleton projects:** Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best match, iterate within proven structure.
138
139## Performance
140
141**Context management:** Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features. Lower-sensitivity tasks (single edits, docs, simple fixes) tolerate higher utilization.
142
143**Build troubleshooting:** Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.
144
145## Project Structure
146
147```
148agents/ — 48 specialized subagents
149skills/ — 183 workflow skills and domain knowledge
150commands/ — 79 slash commands
151hooks/ — Trigger-based automations
152rules/ — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
153scripts/ — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
154mcp-configs/ — 14 MCP server configurations
155tests/ — Test suite
156```
157
158`commands/` remains in the repo for compatibility, but the long-term direction is skills-first.
159
160## Success Metrics
161
162- All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
163- No security vulnerabilities
164- Code is readable and maintainable
165- Performance is acceptable
166- User requirements are met
167
@@ −1 +1 @@
1−# 开发工作流
1+# Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
22
3−> 此文件扩展 [common/git-workflow.md](./git-workflow.md)，包含 git 操作之前的完整功能开发流程。
3+This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 48 specialized agents, 183 skills, 79 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.
44
5−功能实现工作流描述了开发管道：研究、规划、TDD、代码审查，然后提交到 git。
5+**Version:** 1.10.0
66
7−## 功能实现工作流
7+## Core Principles
88
9−0. **研究与重用** _(任何新实现前必需)_
10− - **GitHub 代码搜索优先：** 在编写任何新代码之前，运行 `gh search repos` 和 `gh search code` 查找现有实现、模板和模式。
11− - **库文档其次：** 使用 Context7 或主要供应商文档确认 API 行为、包使用和版本特定细节。
12− - **仅当前两者不足时使用 Exa：** 在 GitHub 搜索和主要文档之后，使用 Exa 进行更广泛的网络研究或发现。
13− - **检查包注册表：** 在编写工具代码之前搜索 npm、PyPI、crates.io 和其他注册表。首选久经考验的库而非手工编写的解决方案。
14− - **搜索可适配的实现：** 寻找解决问题 80%+ 且可以分支、移植或包装的开源项目。
15− - 当满足需求时，优先采用或移植经验证的方法而非从头编写新代码。
9+1. **Agent-First** — Delegate to specialized agents for domain tasks
10+2. **Test-Driven** — Write tests before implementation, 80%+ coverage required
11+3. **Security-First** — Never compromise on security; validate all inputs
12+4. **Immutability** — Always create new objects, never mutate existing ones
13+5. **Plan Before Execute** — Plan complex features before writing code
1614
17−1. **先规划**
18− - 使用 **planner** 代理创建实现计划
19− - 编码前生成规划文档：PRD、架构、系统设计、技术文档、任务列表
20− - 识别依赖和风险
21− - 分解为阶段
15+## Available Agents
2216
23−2. **TDD 方法**
24− - 使用 **tdd-guide** 代理
25− - 先写测试（RED）
26− - 实现以通过测试（GREEN）
27− - 重构（IMPROVE）
28− - 验证 80%+ 覆盖率
17+| Agent | Purpose | When to Use |
18+|-------|---------|-------------|
19+| planner | Implementation planning | Complex features, refactoring |
20+| architect | System design and scalability | Architectural decisions |
21+| tdd-guide | Test-driven development | New features, bug fixes |
22+| code-reviewer | Code quality and maintainability | After writing/modifying code |
23+| security-reviewer | Vulnerability detection | Before commits, sensitive code |
24+| build-error-resolver | Fix build/type errors | When build fails |
25+| e2e-runner | End-to-end Playwright testing | Critical user flows |
26+| refactor-cleaner | Dead code cleanup | Code maintenance |
27+| doc-updater | Documentation and codemaps | Updating docs |
28+| cpp-reviewer | C/C++ code review | C and C++ projects |
29+| cpp-build-resolver | C/C++ build errors | C and C++ build failures |
30+| docs-lookup | Documentation lookup via Context7 | API/docs questions |
31+| go-reviewer | Go code review | Go projects |
32+| go-build-resolver | Go build errors | Go build failures |
33+| kotlin-reviewer | Kotlin code review | Kotlin/Android/KMP projects |
34+| kotlin-build-resolver | Kotlin/Gradle build errors | Kotlin build failures |
35+| database-reviewer | PostgreSQL/Supabase specialist | Schema design, query optimization |
36+| python-reviewer | Python code review | Python projects |
37+| java-reviewer | Java and Spring Boot code review | Java/Spring Boot projects |
38+| java-build-resolver | Java/Maven/Gradle build errors | Java build failures |
39+| loop-operator | Autonomous loop execution | Run loops safely, monitor stalls, intervene |
40+| harness-optimizer | Harness config tuning | Reliability, cost, throughput |
41+| rust-reviewer | Rust code review | Rust projects |
42+| rust-build-resolver | Rust build errors | Rust build failures |
43+| pytorch-build-resolver | PyTorch runtime/CUDA/training errors | PyTorch build/training failures |
44+| typescript-reviewer | TypeScript/JavaScript code review | TypeScript/JavaScript projects |
2945
30−3. **代码审查**
31− - 编写代码后立即使用 **code-reviewer** 代理
32− - 解决关键和高优先级问题
33− - 尽可能修复中优先级问题
46+## Agent Orchestration
3447
35−4. **提交与推送**
36− - 详细的提交消息
37− - 遵循约定式提交格式
38− - 参见 [git-workflow.md](./git-workflow.md) 了解提交消息格式和 PR 流程
48+Use agents proactively without user prompt:
49+- Complex feature requests → **planner**
50+- Code just written/modified → **code-reviewer**
51+- Bug fix or new feature → **tdd-guide**
52+- Architectural decision → **architect**
53+- Security-sensitive code → **security-reviewer**
54+- Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → **loop-operator**
55+- Harness config reliability and cost → **harness-optimizer**
3956
40−5. **审查前检查**
41− - 验证所有自动化检查（CI/CD）已通过
42− - 解决任何合并冲突
43− - 确保分支已与目标分支同步
44− - 仅在这些检查通过后请求审查
57+Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.
58+
59+## Security Guidelines
60+
61+**Before ANY commit:**
62+- No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
63+- All user inputs validated
64+- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
65+- XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
66+- CSRF protection enabled
67+- Authentication/authorization verified
68+- Rate limiting on all endpoints
69+- Error messages don't leak sensitive data
70+
71+**Secret management:** NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager. Validate required secrets at startup. Rotate any exposed secrets immediately.
72+
73+**If security issue found:** STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar issues.
74+
75+## Coding Style
76+
77+**Immutability (CRITICAL):** Always create new objects, never mutate. Return new copies with changes applied.
78+
79+**File organization:** Many small files over few large ones. 200-400 lines typical, 800 max. Organize by feature/domain, not by type. High cohesion, low coupling.
80+
81+**Error handling:** Handle errors at every level. Provide user-friendly messages in UI code. Log detailed context server-side. Never silently swallow errors.
82+
83+**Input validation:** Validate all user input at system boundaries. Use schema-based validation. Fail fast with clear messages. Never trust external data.
84+
85+**Code quality checklist:**
86+- Functions small (<50 lines), files focused (<800 lines)
87+- No deep nesting (>4 levels)
88+- Proper error handling, no hardcoded values
89+- Readable, well-named identifiers
90+
91+## Testing Requirements
92+
93+**Minimum coverage: 80%**
94+
95+Test types (all required):
96+1. **Unit tests** — Individual functions, utilities, components
97+2. **Integration tests** — API endpoints, database operations
98+3. **E2E tests** — Critical user flows
99+
100+**TDD workflow (mandatory):**
101+1. Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
102+2. Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
103+3. Refactor (IMPROVE) — verify coverage 80%+
104+
105+Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementation (not tests, unless tests are wrong).
106+
107+## Development Workflow
108+
109+1. **Plan** — Use planner agent, identify dependencies and risks, break into phases
110+2. **TDD** — Use tdd-guide agent, write tests first, implement, refactor
111+3. **Review** — Use code-reviewer agent immediately, address CRITICAL/HIGH issues
112+4. **Capture knowledge in the right place**
113+ - Personal debugging notes, preferences, and temporary context → auto memory
114+ - Team/project knowledge (architecture decisions, API changes, runbooks) → the project's existing docs structure
115+ - If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
116+ - If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
117+5. **Commit** — Conventional commits format, comprehensive PR summaries
118+
119+## Workflow Surface Policy
120+
121+- `skills/` is the canonical workflow surface.
122+- New workflow contributions should land in `skills/` first.
123+- `commands/` is a legacy slash-entry compatibility surface and should only be added or updated when a shim is still required for migration or cross-harness parity.
124+
125+## Git Workflow
126+
127+**Commit format:** `<type>: <description>` — Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci
128+
129+**PR workflow:** Analyze full commit history → draft comprehensive summary → include test plan → push with `-u` flag.
130+
131+## Architecture Patterns
132+
133+**API response format:** Consistent envelope with success indicator, data payload, error message, and pagination metadata.
134+
135+**Repository pattern:** Encapsulate data access behind standard interface (findAll, findById, create, update, delete). Business logic depends on abstract interface, not storage mechanism.
136+
137+**Skeleton projects:** Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best match, iterate within proven structure.
138+
139+## Performance
140+
141+**Context management:** Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features. Lower-sensitivity tasks (single edits, docs, simple fixes) tolerate higher utilization.
142+
143+**Build troubleshooting:** Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.
144+
145+## Project Structure
146+
147+```
148+agents/ — 48 specialized subagents
149+skills/ — 183 workflow skills and domain knowledge
150+commands/ — 79 slash commands
151+hooks/ — Trigger-based automations
152+rules/ — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
153+scripts/ — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
154+mcp-configs/ — 14 MCP server configurations
155+tests/ — Test suite
156+```
157+
158+`commands/` remains in the repo for compatibility, but the long-term direction is skills-first.
159+
160+## Success Metrics
161+
162+- All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
163+- No security vulnerabilities
164+- Code is readable and maintainable
165+- Performance is acceptable
166+- User requirements are met
45167
