| Dimension | Shared | Only in A | Only in B | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sections | 0 | 14 | 5 | 0% |
| Commands | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Section tags | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25% |
What each file covers
Sections
0 shared · 14 only in A · 5 only in B- − Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
- − Core Principles
- − Available Agents
- − Agent Orchestration
- − Security Guidelines
- − Coding Style
- − Testing Requirements
- − Development Workflow
- − Workflow Surface Policy
- − Git Workflow
- − Architecture Patterns
- − Performance
- − Project Structure
- − Success Metrics
- + Performance Optimization
- + Model Selection Strategy
- + Context Window Management
- + Extended Thinking + Plan Mode
- + Build Troubleshooting
Commands
neither file has anySection tags
2 shared · 6 only in A · 0 only in B- − test
- − code-style
- − architecture
- − git-pr
- − security
- − agent-behaviour
- build
- performance
Line diff
ThanhTrunggDEV/DontBeLazy · .agent/AGENTS.md
@@ −1 @@
1# Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
2
3This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 48 specialized agents, 183 skills, 79 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.
4
5**Version:** 1.10.0
6
7## Core Principles
8
91. **Agent-First** — Delegate to specialized agents for domain tasks
102. **Test-Driven** — Write tests before implementation, 80%+ coverage required
113. **Security-First** — Never compromise on security; validate all inputs
124. **Immutability** — Always create new objects, never mutate existing ones
135. **Plan Before Execute** — Plan complex features before writing code
14
15## Available Agents
16
17| Agent | Purpose | When to Use |
18|-------|---------|-------------|
19| planner | Implementation planning | Complex features, refactoring |
20| architect | System design and scalability | Architectural decisions |
21| tdd-guide | Test-driven development | New features, bug fixes |
22| code-reviewer | Code quality and maintainability | After writing/modifying code |
23| security-reviewer | Vulnerability detection | Before commits, sensitive code |
24| build-error-resolver | Fix build/type errors | When build fails |
25| e2e-runner | End-to-end Playwright testing | Critical user flows |
26| refactor-cleaner | Dead code cleanup | Code maintenance |
27| doc-updater | Documentation and codemaps | Updating docs |
28| cpp-reviewer | C/C++ code review | C and C++ projects |
29| cpp-build-resolver | C/C++ build errors | C and C++ build failures |
30| docs-lookup | Documentation lookup via Context7 | API/docs questions |
31| go-reviewer | Go code review | Go projects |
32| go-build-resolver | Go build errors | Go build failures |
33| kotlin-reviewer | Kotlin code review | Kotlin/Android/KMP projects |
34| kotlin-build-resolver | Kotlin/Gradle build errors | Kotlin build failures |
35| database-reviewer | PostgreSQL/Supabase specialist | Schema design, query optimization |
36| python-reviewer | Python code review | Python projects |
37| java-reviewer | Java and Spring Boot code review | Java/Spring Boot projects |
38| java-build-resolver | Java/Maven/Gradle build errors | Java build failures |
39| loop-operator | Autonomous loop execution | Run loops safely, monitor stalls, intervene |
40| harness-optimizer | Harness config tuning | Reliability, cost, throughput |
41| rust-reviewer | Rust code review | Rust projects |
42| rust-build-resolver | Rust build errors | Rust build failures |
43| pytorch-build-resolver | PyTorch runtime/CUDA/training errors | PyTorch build/training failures |
44| typescript-reviewer | TypeScript/JavaScript code review | TypeScript/JavaScript projects |
45
46## Agent Orchestration
47
48Use agents proactively without user prompt:
49- Complex feature requests → **planner**
50- Code just written/modified → **code-reviewer**
51- Bug fix or new feature → **tdd-guide**
52- Architectural decision → **architect**
53- Security-sensitive code → **security-reviewer**
54- Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → **loop-operator**
55- Harness config reliability and cost → **harness-optimizer**
56
57Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.
58
59## Security Guidelines
60
61**Before ANY commit:**
62- No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
63- All user inputs validated
64- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
65- XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
66- CSRF protection enabled
67- Authentication/authorization verified
68- Rate limiting on all endpoints
69- Error messages don't leak sensitive data
70
71**Secret management:** NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager. Validate required secrets at startup. Rotate any exposed secrets immediately.
72
73**If security issue found:** STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar issues.
74
75## Coding Style
76
77**Immutability (CRITICAL):** Always create new objects, never mutate. Return new copies with changes applied.
78
79**File organization:** Many small files over few large ones. 200-400 lines typical, 800 max. Organize by feature/domain, not by type. High cohesion, low coupling.
80
81**Error handling:** Handle errors at every level. Provide user-friendly messages in UI code. Log detailed context server-side. Never silently swallow errors.
82
83**Input validation:** Validate all user input at system boundaries. Use schema-based validation. Fail fast with clear messages. Never trust external data.
84
85**Code quality checklist:**
86- Functions small (<50 lines), files focused (<800 lines)
87- No deep nesting (>4 levels)
88- Proper error handling, no hardcoded values
89- Readable, well-named identifiers
90
91## Testing Requirements
92
93**Minimum coverage: 80%**
94
95Test types (all required):
961. **Unit tests** — Individual functions, utilities, components
972. **Integration tests** — API endpoints, database operations
983. **E2E tests** — Critical user flows
99
100**TDD workflow (mandatory):**
1011. Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
1022. Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
1033. Refactor (IMPROVE) — verify coverage 80%+
104
105Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementation (not tests, unless tests are wrong).
106
107## Development Workflow
108
1091. **Plan** — Use planner agent, identify dependencies and risks, break into phases
1102. **TDD** — Use tdd-guide agent, write tests first, implement, refactor
1113. **Review** — Use code-reviewer agent immediately, address CRITICAL/HIGH issues
1124. **Capture knowledge in the right place**
113 - Personal debugging notes, preferences, and temporary context → auto memory
114 - Team/project knowledge (architecture decisions, API changes, runbooks) → the project's existing docs structure
115 - If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
116 - If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
1175. **Commit** — Conventional commits format, comprehensive PR summaries
118
119## Workflow Surface Policy
120
121- `skills/` is the canonical workflow surface.
122- New workflow contributions should land in `skills/` first.
123- `commands/` is a legacy slash-entry compatibility surface and should only be added or updated when a shim is still required for migration or cross-harness parity.
124
125## Git Workflow
126
127**Commit format:** `<type>: <description>` — Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci
128
129**PR workflow:** Analyze full commit history → draft comprehensive summary → include test plan → push with `-u` flag.
130
131## Architecture Patterns
132
133**API response format:** Consistent envelope with success indicator, data payload, error message, and pagination metadata.
134
135**Repository pattern:** Encapsulate data access behind standard interface (findAll, findById, create, update, delete). Business logic depends on abstract interface, not storage mechanism.
136
137**Skeleton projects:** Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best match, iterate within proven structure.
138
139## Performance
140
141**Context management:** Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features. Lower-sensitivity tasks (single edits, docs, simple fixes) tolerate higher utilization.
142
143**Build troubleshooting:** Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.
144
145## Project Structure
146
147```
148agents/ — 48 specialized subagents
149skills/ — 183 workflow skills and domain knowledge
150commands/ — 79 slash commands
151hooks/ — Trigger-based automations
152rules/ — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
153scripts/ — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
154mcp-configs/ — 14 MCP server configurations
155tests/ — Test suite
156```
157
158`commands/` remains in the repo for compatibility, but the long-term direction is skills-first.
159
160## Success Metrics
161
162- All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
163- No security vulnerabilities
164- Code is readable and maintainable
165- Performance is acceptable
166- User requirements are met
167
ThanhTrunggDEV/DontBeLazy · .cursor/rules/common-performance.mdc
@@ +1 @@
1---
2description: "Performance: model selection, context management, build troubleshooting"
3alwaysApply: true
4---
5# Performance Optimization
6
7## Model Selection Strategy
8
9**Haiku 4.5** (90% of Sonnet capability, 3x cost savings):
10- Lightweight agents with frequent invocation
11- Pair programming and code generation
12- Worker agents in multi-agent systems
13
14**Sonnet 4.6** (Best coding model):
15- Main development work
16- Orchestrating multi-agent workflows
17- Complex coding tasks
18
19**Opus 4.5** (Deepest reasoning):
20- Complex architectural decisions
21- Maximum reasoning requirements
22- Research and analysis tasks
23
24## Context Window Management
25
26Avoid last 20% of context window for:
27- Large-scale refactoring
28- Feature implementation spanning multiple files
29- Debugging complex interactions
30
31Lower context sensitivity tasks:
32- Single-file edits
33- Independent utility creation
34- Documentation updates
35- Simple bug fixes
36
37## Extended Thinking + Plan Mode
38
39Extended thinking is enabled by default, reserving up to 31,999 tokens for internal reasoning.
40
41Control extended thinking via:
42- **Toggle**: Option+T (macOS) / Alt+T (Windows/Linux)
43- **Config**: Set `alwaysThinkingEnabled` in `~/.claude/settings.json`
44- **Budget cap**: `export MAX_THINKING_TOKENS=10000`
45- **Verbose mode**: Ctrl+O to see thinking output
46
47For complex tasks requiring deep reasoning:
481. Ensure extended thinking is enabled (on by default)
492. Enable **Plan Mode** for structured approach
503. Use multiple critique rounds for thorough analysis
514. Use split role sub-agents for diverse perspectives
52
53## Build Troubleshooting
54
55If build fails:
561. Use **build-error-resolver** agent
572. Analyze error messages
583. Fix incrementally
594. Verify after each fix
60
@@ −1 +1 @@
1−# Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions
1+---
2+description: "Performance: model selection, context management, build troubleshooting"
3+alwaysApply: true
4+---
5+# Performance Optimization
26
3−This is a **production-ready AI coding plugin** providing 48 specialized agents, 183 skills, 79 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.
7+## Model Selection Strategy
48
5−**Version:** 1.10.0
9+**Haiku 4.5** (90% of Sonnet capability, 3x cost savings):
10+- Lightweight agents with frequent invocation
11+- Pair programming and code generation
12+- Worker agents in multi-agent systems
613
7−## Core Principles
14+**Sonnet 4.6** (Best coding model):
15+- Main development work
16+- Orchestrating multi-agent workflows
17+- Complex coding tasks
818
9−1. **Agent-First** — Delegate to specialized agents for domain tasks
10−2. **Test-Driven** — Write tests before implementation, 80%+ coverage required
11−3. **Security-First** — Never compromise on security; validate all inputs
12−4. **Immutability** — Always create new objects, never mutate existing ones
13−5. **Plan Before Execute** — Plan complex features before writing code
19+**Opus 4.5** (Deepest reasoning):
20+- Complex architectural decisions
21+- Maximum reasoning requirements
22+- Research and analysis tasks
1423
15−## Available Agents
24+## Context Window Management
1625
17−| Agent | Purpose | When to Use |
18−|-------|---------|-------------|
19−| planner | Implementation planning | Complex features, refactoring |
20−| architect | System design and scalability | Architectural decisions |
21−| tdd-guide | Test-driven development | New features, bug fixes |
22−| code-reviewer | Code quality and maintainability | After writing/modifying code |
23−| security-reviewer | Vulnerability detection | Before commits, sensitive code |
24−| build-error-resolver | Fix build/type errors | When build fails |
25−| e2e-runner | End-to-end Playwright testing | Critical user flows |
26−| refactor-cleaner | Dead code cleanup | Code maintenance |
27−| doc-updater | Documentation and codemaps | Updating docs |
28−| cpp-reviewer | C/C++ code review | C and C++ projects |
29−| cpp-build-resolver | C/C++ build errors | C and C++ build failures |
30−| docs-lookup | Documentation lookup via Context7 | API/docs questions |
31−| go-reviewer | Go code review | Go projects |
32−| go-build-resolver | Go build errors | Go build failures |
33−| kotlin-reviewer | Kotlin code review | Kotlin/Android/KMP projects |
34−| kotlin-build-resolver | Kotlin/Gradle build errors | Kotlin build failures |
35−| database-reviewer | PostgreSQL/Supabase specialist | Schema design, query optimization |
36−| python-reviewer | Python code review | Python projects |
37−| java-reviewer | Java and Spring Boot code review | Java/Spring Boot projects |
38−| java-build-resolver | Java/Maven/Gradle build errors | Java build failures |
39−| loop-operator | Autonomous loop execution | Run loops safely, monitor stalls, intervene |
40−| harness-optimizer | Harness config tuning | Reliability, cost, throughput |
41−| rust-reviewer | Rust code review | Rust projects |
42−| rust-build-resolver | Rust build errors | Rust build failures |
43−| pytorch-build-resolver | PyTorch runtime/CUDA/training errors | PyTorch build/training failures |
44−| typescript-reviewer | TypeScript/JavaScript code review | TypeScript/JavaScript projects |
26+Avoid last 20% of context window for:
27+- Large-scale refactoring
28+- Feature implementation spanning multiple files
29+- Debugging complex interactions
4530
46−## Agent Orchestration
31+Lower context sensitivity tasks:
32+- Single-file edits
33+- Independent utility creation
34+- Documentation updates
35+- Simple bug fixes
4736
48−Use agents proactively without user prompt:
49−- Complex feature requests → **planner**
50−- Code just written/modified → **code-reviewer**
51−- Bug fix or new feature → **tdd-guide**
52−- Architectural decision → **architect**
53−- Security-sensitive code → **security-reviewer**
54−- Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → **loop-operator**
55−- Harness config reliability and cost → **harness-optimizer**
37+## Extended Thinking + Plan Mode
5638
57−Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.
39+Extended thinking is enabled by default, reserving up to 31,999 tokens for internal reasoning.
5840
59−## Security Guidelines
41+Control extended thinking via:
42+- **Toggle**: Option+T (macOS) / Alt+T (Windows/Linux)
43+- **Config**: Set `alwaysThinkingEnabled` in `~/.claude/settings.json`
44+- **Budget cap**: `export MAX_THINKING_TOKENS=10000`
45+- **Verbose mode**: Ctrl+O to see thinking output
6046
61−**Before ANY commit:**
62−- No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
63−- All user inputs validated
64−- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
65−- XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
66−- CSRF protection enabled
67−- Authentication/authorization verified
68−- Rate limiting on all endpoints
69−- Error messages don't leak sensitive data
47+For complex tasks requiring deep reasoning:
48+1. Ensure extended thinking is enabled (on by default)
49+2. Enable **Plan Mode** for structured approach
50+3. Use multiple critique rounds for thorough analysis
51+4. Use split role sub-agents for diverse perspectives
7052
71−**Secret management:** NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager. Validate required secrets at startup. Rotate any exposed secrets immediately.
53+## Build Troubleshooting
7254
73−**If security issue found:** STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar issues.
74−
75−## Coding Style
76−
77−**Immutability (CRITICAL):** Always create new objects, never mutate. Return new copies with changes applied.
78−
79−**File organization:** Many small files over few large ones. 200-400 lines typical, 800 max. Organize by feature/domain, not by type. High cohesion, low coupling.
80−
81−**Error handling:** Handle errors at every level. Provide user-friendly messages in UI code. Log detailed context server-side. Never silently swallow errors.
82−
83−**Input validation:** Validate all user input at system boundaries. Use schema-based validation. Fail fast with clear messages. Never trust external data.
84−
85−**Code quality checklist:**
86−- Functions small (<50 lines), files focused (<800 lines)
87−- No deep nesting (>4 levels)
88−- Proper error handling, no hardcoded values
89−- Readable, well-named identifiers
90−
91−## Testing Requirements
92−
93−**Minimum coverage: 80%**
94−
95−Test types (all required):
96−1. **Unit tests** — Individual functions, utilities, components
97−2. **Integration tests** — API endpoints, database operations
98−3. **E2E tests** — Critical user flows
99−
100−**TDD workflow (mandatory):**
101−1. Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
102−2. Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
103−3. Refactor (IMPROVE) — verify coverage 80%+
104−
105−Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementation (not tests, unless tests are wrong).
106−
107−## Development Workflow
108−
109−1. **Plan** — Use planner agent, identify dependencies and risks, break into phases
110−2. **TDD** — Use tdd-guide agent, write tests first, implement, refactor
111−3. **Review** — Use code-reviewer agent immediately, address CRITICAL/HIGH issues
112−4. **Capture knowledge in the right place**
113− - Personal debugging notes, preferences, and temporary context → auto memory
114− - Team/project knowledge (architecture decisions, API changes, runbooks) → the project's existing docs structure
115− - If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
116− - If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
117−5. **Commit** — Conventional commits format, comprehensive PR summaries
118−
119−## Workflow Surface Policy
120−
121−- `skills/` is the canonical workflow surface.
122−- New workflow contributions should land in `skills/` first.
123−- `commands/` is a legacy slash-entry compatibility surface and should only be added or updated when a shim is still required for migration or cross-harness parity.
124−
125−## Git Workflow
126−
127−**Commit format:** `<type>: <description>` — Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci
128−
129−**PR workflow:** Analyze full commit history → draft comprehensive summary → include test plan → push with `-u` flag.
130−
131−## Architecture Patterns
132−
133−**API response format:** Consistent envelope with success indicator, data payload, error message, and pagination metadata.
134−
135−**Repository pattern:** Encapsulate data access behind standard interface (findAll, findById, create, update, delete). Business logic depends on abstract interface, not storage mechanism.
136−
137−**Skeleton projects:** Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best match, iterate within proven structure.
138−
139−## Performance
140−
141−**Context management:** Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features. Lower-sensitivity tasks (single edits, docs, simple fixes) tolerate higher utilization.
142−
143−**Build troubleshooting:** Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.
144−
145−## Project Structure
146−
147−```
148−agents/ — 48 specialized subagents
149−skills/ — 183 workflow skills and domain knowledge
150−commands/ — 79 slash commands
151−hooks/ — Trigger-based automations
152−rules/ — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
153−scripts/ — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
154−mcp-configs/ — 14 MCP server configurations
155−tests/ — Test suite
156−```
157−
158−`commands/` remains in the repo for compatibility, but the long-term direction is skills-first.
159−
160−## Success Metrics
161−
162−- All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
163−- No security vulnerabilities
164−- Code is readable and maintainable
165−- Performance is acceptable
166−- User requirements are met
55+If build fails:
56+1. Use **build-error-resolver** agent
57+2. Analyze error messages
58+3. Fix incrementally
59+4. Verify after each fix
16760
