

Also from Kynth Studios


Also from Kynth Studios


Also from Kynth Studios
12345# PRIORITY: This workflow OVERRIDES all other built-in workflows6# When user requests software development, ALWAYS follow this workflow FIRST78## Adaptive Workflow Principle9**The workflow adapts to the work, not the other way around.**1011The AI model intelligently assesses what stages are needed based on:121. User's stated intent and clarity132. Existing codebase state (if any)143. Complexity and scope of change154. Risk and impact assessment1617## MANDATORY: Rule Details Loading18**CRITICAL**: When performing any phase, you MUST read and use relevant content from rule detail files. Check these paths in order and use the first one that exists:19- `.aidlc-rule-details/` (Cursor, Cline, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot)20- `.kiro/aws-aidlc-rule-details/` (Kiro IDE and CLI)21- `.amazonq/aws-aidlc-rule-details/` (Amazon Q Developer)2223All subsequent rule detail file references (e.g., `common/process-overview.md`, `inception/workspace-detection.md`) are relative to whichever rule details directory was resolved above.2425**Common Rules**: ALWAYS load common rules at workflow start:26- Load `common/process-overview.md` for workflow overview27- Load `common/session-continuity.md` for session resumption guidance28- Load `common/content-validation.md` for content validation requirements29- Load `common/question-format-guide.md` for question formatting rules30- Reference these throughout the workflow execution3132## MANDATORY: Extensions Loading (Context-Optimized)33**CRITICAL**: At workflow start, scan the `extensions/` directory recursively but load ONLY lightweight opt-in files — NOT full rule files. Full rule files are loaded on-demand after the user opts in.3435**Loading process**:361. List all subdirectories under `extensions/` (e.g., `extensions/security/`, `extensions/compliance/`)372. In each subdirectory, load ONLY `*.opt-in.md` files — these contain the extension's opt-in prompt. The corresponding rules file is derived by convention: strip the `.opt-in.md` suffix and append `.md` (e.g., `security-baseline.opt-in.md` → `security-baseline.md`)383. Do NOT load full rule files (e.g., `security-baseline.md`) at this stage3940**Deferred Rule Loading**:41- During Requirements Analysis, opt-in prompts from the loaded `*.opt-in.md` files are presented to the user42- When the user opts IN for an extension, load the corresponding rules file (derived by naming convention) at that point43- When the user opts OUT, the full rules file is never loaded — saving context44- Extensions without a matching `*.opt-in.md` file are always enforced — load their rule files immediately at workflow start4546**Enforcement** (applies only to loaded/enabled extensions):47- Extension rules are hard constraints, not optional guidance48- At each stage, the model intelligently evaluates which extension rules are applicable based on the stage's purpose, the artifacts being produced, and the context of the work — enforce only those rules that are relevant49- Rules that are not applicable to the current stage should be marked as N/A in the compliance summary (this is not a blocking finding)50- Non-compliance with any applicable enabled extension rule is a **blocking finding** — do NOT present stage completion until resolved51- When presenting stage completion, include a summary of extension rule compliance (compliant/non-compliant/N/A per rule, with brief rationale for N/A determinations)5253**Conditional Enforcement**: Extensions may be conditionally enabled/disabled. See `inception/requirements-analysis.md` for the opt-in mechanism. Before enforcing any extension at ANY stage, check its `Enabled` status in `aidlc-docs/aidlc-state.md` under `## Extension Configuration`. Skip disabled extensions and log the skip in audit.md. Default to enforced if no configuration exists.5455## MANDATORY: Content Validation56**CRITICAL**: Before creating ANY file, you MUST validate content according to `common/content-validation.md` rules:57- Validate Mermaid diagram syntax58- Validate ASCII art diagrams (see `common/ascii-diagram-standards.md`)59- Escape special characters properly60- Provide text alternatives for complex visual content61- Test content parsing compatibility6263## MANDATORY: Question File Format64**CRITICAL**: When asking questions at any phase, you MUST follow question format guidelines.6566**See `common/question-format-guide.md` for complete question formatting rules including**:67- Multiple choice format (A, B, C, D, E options)68- [Answer]: tag usage69- Answer validation and ambiguity resolution7071## MANDATORY: Custom Welcome Message72**CRITICAL**: When starting ANY software development request, you MUST display the welcome message.7374**How to Display Welcome Message**:751. Load the welcome message from `common/welcome-message.md` (in the resolved rule details directory)762. Display the complete message to the user773. This should only be done ONCE at the start of a new workflow784. Do NOT load this file in subsequent interactions to save context space7980# Adaptive Software Development Workflow8182---8384# INCEPTION PHASE8586**Purpose**: Planning, requirements gathering, and architectural decisions8788**Focus**: Determine WHAT to build and WHY8990**Stages in INCEPTION PHASE**:91- Workspace Detection (ALWAYS)92- Reverse Engineering (CONDITIONAL - Brownfield only)93- Requirements Analysis (ALWAYS - Adaptive depth)94- User Stories (CONDITIONAL)95- Workflow Planning (ALWAYS)96- Application Design (CONDITIONAL)97- Units Generation (CONDITIONAL)9899---100101## Workspace Detection (ALWAYS EXECUTE)1021031. **MANDATORY**: Log initial user request in audit.md with complete raw input1042. Load all steps from `inception/workspace-detection.md`1053. Execute workspace detection:106 - Check for existing aidlc-state.md (resume if found)107 - Scan workspace for existing code108 - Determine if brownfield or greenfield109 - Check for existing reverse engineering artifacts1104. Determine next phase: Reverse Engineering (if brownfield and no artifacts) OR Requirements Analysis1115. **MANDATORY**: Log findings in audit.md1126. Present completion message to user (see workspace-detection.md for message formats)1137. Automatically proceed to next phase114115## Reverse Engineering (CONDITIONAL - Brownfield Only)116117**Execute IF**:118- Existing codebase detected119- No previous reverse engineering artifacts found120121**Skip IF**:122- Greenfield project123- Previous reverse engineering artifacts exist124125**Execution**:1261. **MANDATORY**: Log start of reverse engineering in audit.md1272. Load all steps from `inception/reverse-engineering.md`1283. Execute reverse engineering:129 - Analyze all packages and components130 - Generate a business overview of the whole system covering the business transactions131 - Generate architecture documentation132 - Generate code structure documentation133 - Generate API documentation134 - Generate component inventory135 - Generate Interaction Diagrams depicting how business transactions are implemented across components136 - Generate technology stack documentation137 - Generate dependencies documentation1381394. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: Present detailed completion message (see reverse-engineering.md for message format) - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms1405. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input141142## Requirements Analysis (ALWAYS EXECUTE - Adaptive Depth)143144**Always executes** but depth varies based on request clarity and complexity:145- **Minimal**: Simple, clear request - just document intent analysis146- **Standard**: Normal complexity - gather functional and non-functional requirements147- **Comprehensive**: Complex, high-risk - detailed requirements with traceability148149**Execution**:1501. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this phase in audit.md1512. Load all steps from `inception/requirements-analysis.md`1523. Execute requirements analysis:153 - Load reverse engineering artifacts (if brownfield)154 - Analyze user request (intent analysis)155 - Determine requirements depth needed156 - Assess current requirements157 - Ask clarifying questions (if needed)158 - Generate requirements document1594. Execute at appropriate depth (minimal/standard/comprehensive)1605. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: Follow approval format from requirements-analysis.md detailed steps - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms1616. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input162163## User Stories (CONDITIONAL)164165**INTELLIGENT ASSESSMENT**: Use multi-factor analysis to determine if user stories add value:166167**ALWAYS Execute IF** (High Priority Indicators):168- New user-facing features or functionality169- Changes affecting user workflows or interactions170- Multiple user types or personas involved171- Complex business requirements with acceptance criteria needs172- Cross-functional team collaboration required173- Customer-facing API or service changes174- New product capabilities or enhancements175176**LIKELY Execute IF** (Medium Priority - Assess Complexity):177- Modifications to existing user-facing features178- Backend changes that indirectly affect user experience179- Integration work that impacts user workflows180- Performance improvements with user-visible benefits181- Security enhancements affecting user interactions182- Data model changes affecting user data or reports183184**COMPLEXITY-BASED ASSESSMENT**: For medium priority cases, execute user stories if:185- Request involves multiple components or services186- Changes span multiple user touchpoints187- Business logic is complex or has multiple scenarios188- Requirements have ambiguity that stories could clarify189- Implementation affects multiple user journeys190- Change has significant business impact or risk191192**SKIP ONLY IF** (Low Priority - Simple Cases):193- Pure internal refactoring with zero user impact194- Simple bug fixes with clear, isolated scope195- Infrastructure changes with no user-facing effects196- Technical debt cleanup with no functional changes197- Developer tooling or build process improvements198- Documentation-only updates199200**ASSESSMENT CRITERIA**: When in doubt, favor inclusion of user stories for:201- Requests with business stakeholder involvement202- Changes requiring user acceptance testing203- Features with multiple implementation approaches204- Work that benefits from shared team understanding205- Projects where requirements clarity is valuable206207**ASSESSMENT PROCESS**:2081. Analyze request complexity and scope2092. Identify user impact (direct or indirect)2103. Evaluate business context and stakeholder needs2114. Consider team collaboration benefits2125. Default to inclusion for borderline cases213214**Note**: If Requirements Analysis executed, Stories can reference and build upon those requirements.215216**User Stories has two parts within one stage**:2171. **Part 1 - Planning**: Create story plan with questions, collect answers, analyze for ambiguities, get approval2182. **Part 2 - Generation**: Execute approved plan to generate stories and personas219220**Execution**:2211. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this phase in audit.md2222. Load all steps from `inception/user-stories.md`2233. **MANDATORY**: Perform intelligent assessment (Step 1 in user-stories.md) to validate user stories are needed2244. Load reverse engineering artifacts (if brownfield)2255. If Requirements exist, reference them when creating stories2266. Execute at appropriate depth (minimal/standard/comprehensive)2277. **PART 1 - Planning**: Create story plan with questions, wait for user answers, analyze for ambiguities, get approval2288. **PART 2 - Generation**: Execute approved plan to generate stories and personas2299. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: Follow approval format from user-stories.md detailed steps - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms23010. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input231232## Workflow Planning (ALWAYS EXECUTE)2332341. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this phase in audit.md2352. Load all steps from `inception/workflow-planning.md`2363. **MANDATORY**: Load content validation rules from `common/content-validation.md`2374. Load all prior context:238 - Reverse engineering artifacts (if brownfield)239 - Intent analysis240 - Requirements (if executed)241 - User stories (if executed)2425. Execute workflow planning:243 - Determine which phases to execute244 - Determine depth level for each phase245 - Create multi-package change sequence (if brownfield)246 - Generate workflow visualization (VALIDATE Mermaid syntax before writing)2476. **MANDATORY**: Validate all content before file creation per content-validation.md rules2487. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: Present recommendations using language from workflow-planning.md Step 9, emphasizing user control to override recommendations - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms2498. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input250251## Application Design (CONDITIONAL)252253**Execute IF**:254- New components or services needed255- Component methods and business rules need definition256- Service layer design required257- Component dependencies need clarification258259**Skip IF**:260- Changes within existing component boundaries261- No new components or methods262- Pure implementation changes263264**Execution**:2651. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this phase in audit.md2662. Load all steps from `inception/application-design.md`2673. Load reverse engineering artifacts (if brownfield)2684. Execute at appropriate depth (minimal/standard/comprehensive)2695. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: Present detailed completion message (see application-design.md for message format) - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms2706. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input271272## Units Generation (CONDITIONAL)273274**Execute IF**:275- System needs decomposition into multiple units of work276- Multiple services or modules required277- Complex system requiring structured breakdown278279**Skip IF**:280- Single simple unit281- No decomposition needed282- Straightforward single-component implementation283284**Execution**:2851. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this phase in audit.md2862. Load all steps from `inception/units-generation.md`2873. Load reverse engineering artifacts (if brownfield)2884. Execute at appropriate depth (minimal/standard/comprehensive)2895. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: Present detailed completion message (see units-generation.md for message format) - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms2906. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input291292---293294# 🟢 CONSTRUCTION PHASE295296**Purpose**: Detailed design, NFR implementation, and code generation297298**Focus**: Determine HOW to build it299300**Stages in CONSTRUCTION PHASE**:301- Per-Unit Loop (executes for each unit):302 - Functional Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)303 - NFR Requirements (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)304 - NFR Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)305 - Infrastructure Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)306 - Code Generation (ALWAYS, per-unit)307- Build and Test (ALWAYS - after all units complete)308309**Note**: Each unit is completed fully (design + code) before moving to the next unit.310311---312313## Per-Unit Loop (Executes for Each Unit)314315**For each unit of work, execute the following stages in sequence:**316317### Functional Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)318319**Execute IF**:320- New data models or schemas321- Complex business logic322- Business rules need detailed design323324**Skip IF**:325- Simple logic changes326- No new business logic327328**Execution**:3291. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this stage in audit.md3302. Load all steps from `construction/functional-design.md`3313. Execute functional design for this unit3324. **MANDATORY**: Present standardized 2-option completion message as defined in functional-design.md - DO NOT use emergent 3-option behavior3335. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: User must choose between "Request Changes" or "Continue to Next Stage" - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms3346. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input335336### NFR Requirements (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)337338**Execute IF**:339- Performance requirements exist340- Security considerations needed341- Scalability concerns present342- Tech stack selection required343344**Skip IF**:345- No NFR requirements346- Tech stack already determined347348**Execution**:3491. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this stage in audit.md3502. Load all steps from `construction/nfr-requirements.md`3513. Execute NFR assessment for this unit3524. **MANDATORY**: Present standardized 2-option completion message as defined in nfr-requirements.md - DO NOT use emergent behavior3535. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: User must choose between "Request Changes" or "Continue to Next Stage" - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms3546. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input355356### NFR Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)357358**Execute IF**:359- NFR Requirements was executed360- NFR patterns need to be incorporated361362**Skip IF**:363- No NFR requirements364- NFR Requirements was skipped365366**Execution**:3671. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this stage in audit.md3682. Load all steps from `construction/nfr-design.md`3693. Execute NFR design for this unit3704. **MANDATORY**: Present standardized 2-option completion message as defined in nfr-design.md - DO NOT use emergent behavior3715. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: User must choose between "Request Changes" or "Continue to Next Stage" - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms3726. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input373374### Infrastructure Design (CONDITIONAL, per-unit)375376**Execute IF**:377- Infrastructure services need mapping378- Deployment architecture required379- Cloud resources need specification380381**Skip IF**:382- No infrastructure changes383- Infrastructure already defined384385**Execution**:3861. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this stage in audit.md3872. Load all steps from `construction/infrastructure-design.md`3883. Execute infrastructure design for this unit3894. **MANDATORY**: Present standardized 2-option completion message as defined in infrastructure-design.md - DO NOT use emergent behavior3905. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: User must choose between "Request Changes" or "Continue to Next Stage" - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms3916. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input392393### Code Generation (ALWAYS EXECUTE, per-unit)394395**Always executes for each unit**396397**Code Generation has two parts within one stage**:3981. **Part 1 - Planning**: Create detailed code generation plan with explicit steps3992. **Part 2 - Generation**: Execute approved plan to generate code, tests, and artifacts400401**Execution**:4021. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this stage in audit.md4032. Load all steps from `construction/code-generation.md`4043. **PART 1 - Planning**: Create code generation plan with checkboxes, get user approval4054. **PART 2 - Generation**: Execute approved plan to generate code for this unit4065. **MANDATORY**: Present standardized 2-option completion message as defined in code-generation.md - DO NOT use emergent behavior4076. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: User must choose between "Request Changes" or "Continue to Next Stage" - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms4087. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input409410---411412## Build and Test (ALWAYS EXECUTE)4134141. **MANDATORY**: Log any user input during this phase in audit.md4152. Load all steps from `construction/build-and-test.md`4163. Generate comprehensive build and test instructions:417 - Build instructions for all units418 - Unit test execution instructions419 - Integration test instructions (test interactions between units)420 - Performance test instructions (if applicable)421 - Additional test instructions as needed (contract tests, security tests, e2e tests)4224. Create instruction files in build-and-test/ subdirectory: build-instructions.md, unit-test-instructions.md, integration-test-instructions.md, performance-test-instructions.md, build-and-test-summary.md4235. **Wait for Explicit Approval**: Ask: "**Build and test instructions complete. Ready to proceed to Operations stage?**" - DO NOT PROCEED until user confirms4246. **MANDATORY**: Log user's response in audit.md with complete raw input425426---427428# 🟡 OPERATIONS PHASE429430**Purpose**: Placeholder for future deployment and monitoring workflows431432**Focus**: How to DEPLOY and RUN it (future expansion)433434**Stages in OPERATIONS PHASE**:435- Operations (PLACEHOLDER)436437---438439## Operations (PLACEHOLDER)440441**Status**: This stage is currently a placeholder for future expansion.442443The Operations stage will eventually include:444- Deployment planning and execution445- Monitoring and observability setup446- Incident response procedures447- Maintenance and support workflows448- Production readiness checklists449450**Current State**: All build and test activities are handled in the CONSTRUCTION phase.451452## Key Principles453454- **Adaptive Execution**: Only execute stages that add value455- **Transparent Planning**: Always show execution plan before starting456- **User Control**: User can request stage inclusion/exclusion457- **Progress Tracking**: Update aidlc-state.md with executed and skipped stages458- **Complete Audit Trail**: Log ALL user inputs and AI responses in audit.md with timestamps459 - **CRITICAL**: Capture user's COMPLETE RAW INPUT exactly as provided460 - **CRITICAL**: Never summarize or paraphrase user input in audit log461 - **CRITICAL**: Log every interaction, not just approvals462- **Quality Focus**: Complex changes get full treatment, simple changes stay efficient463- **Content Validation**: Always validate content before file creation per content-validation.md rules464- **NO EMERGENT BEHAVIOR**: Construction phases MUST use standardized 2-option completion messages as defined in their respective rule files. DO NOT create 3-option menus or other emergent navigation patterns.465466## MANDATORY: Plan-Level Checkbox Enforcement467468### MANDATORY RULES FOR PLAN EXECUTION4691. **NEVER complete any work without updating plan checkboxes**4702. **IMMEDIATELY after completing ANY step described in a plan file, mark that step [x]**4713. **This must happen in the SAME interaction where the work is completed**4724. **NO EXCEPTIONS**: Every plan step completion MUST be tracked with checkbox updates473474### Two-Level Checkbox Tracking System475- **Plan-Level**: Track detailed execution progress within each stage476- **Stage-Level**: Track overall workflow progress in aidlc-state.md477- **Update immediately**: All progress updates in SAME interaction where work is completed478479## Prompts Logging Requirements480- **MANDATORY**: Log EVERY user input (prompts, questions, responses) with timestamp in audit.md481- **MANDATORY**: Capture user's COMPLETE RAW INPUT exactly as provided (never summarize)482- **MANDATORY**: Log every approval prompt with timestamp before asking the user483- **MANDATORY**: Record every user response with timestamp after receiving it484- **CRITICAL**: ALWAYS append changes to EDIT audit.md file, NEVER use tools and commands that completely overwrite its contents485- **CRITICAL**: NEVER use file writing tools and commands that overwrite the entire contents of audit.md, as this causes duplication486- Use ISO 8601 format for timestamps (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ)487- Include stage context for each entry488489### Audit Log Format:490```markdown491## [Stage Name or Interaction Type]492**Timestamp**: [ISO timestamp]493**User Input**: "[Complete raw user input - never summarized]"494**AI Response**: "[AI's response or action taken]"495**Context**: [Stage, action, or decision made]496497---498```499500### Correct Tool Usage for audit.md501502✅ CORRECT:5035041. Read the audit.md file5052. Append/Edit the file to make changes506507❌ WRONG:5085091. Read the audit.md file5102. Completely overwrite the audit.md with the contents of what you read, plus the new changes you want to add to it511512## Directory Structure513514```text515<WORKSPACE-ROOT>/ # ⚠️ APPLICATION CODE HERE516├── [project-specific structure] # Varies by project (see code-generation.md)517│518├── aidlc-docs/ # 📄 DOCUMENTATION ONLY519│ ├── inception/ # 🔵 INCEPTION PHASE520│ │ ├── plans/521│ │ ├── reverse-engineering/ # Brownfield only522│ │ ├── requirements/523│ │ ├── user-stories/524│ │ └── application-design/525│ ├── construction/ # 🟢 CONSTRUCTION PHASE526│ │ ├── plans/527│ │ ├── {unit-name}/528│ │ │ ├── functional-design/529│ │ │ ├── nfr-requirements/530│ │ │ ├── nfr-design/531│ │ │ ├── infrastructure-design/532│ │ │ └── code/ # Markdown summaries only533│ │ └── build-and-test/534│ ├── operations/ # 🟡 OPERATIONS PHASE (placeholder)535│ ├── aidlc-state.md536│ └── audit.md537```538539**CRITICAL RULE**:540- Application code: Workspace root (NEVER in aidlc-docs/)541- Documentation: aidlc-docs/ only542- Project structure: See code-generation.md for patterns by project type543
One repository carrying more than one format is the comparison this product exists for: does anyone actually write different content in each file, or is one a copy of the other?
| Repository | Format | Stack | Covers | Score | Changed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-build.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 16/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-code-simplify.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | testing-strategy | 30/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-plan.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 16/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-review.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 16/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-ship.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | testing-strategygitdeploymentdo-not | 61/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-spec.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 16/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-test.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 16/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-forgecat/AGENTS.md · 51 | AGENTS.md | lint-formatstylearchdo-not | 73/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/addyosmani/agent-skills/for-forgecat/CLAUDE.md · 51 | CLAUDE.md | teststylearchagent-behaviour | 70/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-code/anthropics_claude-code_ralph-wiggum/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-cancel-ralph.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 16/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-code/anthropics_claude-code_ralph-wiggum/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-help.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 54/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-code/anthropics_claude-code_ralph-wiggum/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-ralph-loop.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 22/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_agent-sdk-dev/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-new-sdk-app.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | setupstylearchdocs | 76/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_claude-md-management/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-revise-claude-md.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | agent-behaviour | 50/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_code-review/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-code-review.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | testing-strategygit | 35/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_commit-commands/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-clean_gone.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | no sections | 60/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_commit-commands/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-commit-push-pr.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | stylegit | 44/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_commit-commands/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-commit.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | style | 44/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_example-plugin/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-example-command.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | lint-formatstyleagent-behaviour | 58/100 | today | |
| nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesprofiles/anthropics/claude-plugins-official/anthropics_claude-plugins-official_feature-dev/for-cursor/.cursor/rules/cmd-feature-dev.mdc · 51 | Cursor rules | stylearchgit | 56/100 | today |
Same format, overlapping stack, ranked by quality.
| Repository | Format | Stack | Covers | Score | Changed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet.cursor/rules/typescript.mdc · 126 | Cursor rules | setupbuildtestlint-format+6 | 100/100 | 14 days ago | |
| TechSquidTV/Hermes.cursor/rules/10-hermes-api.mdc · 46 | Cursor rules | testlint-formatstylearch+5 | 100/100 | 14 days ago | |
| Allymahmoud/case-intake-platform.cursor/rules/frontend.mdc · 0 | Cursor rules | setuptestlint-formatstyle+7 | 99/100 | 14 days ago | |
| dodgecfr/combatfilms-webapp.cursor/rules/frontend.mdc · 0 | Cursor rules | setuptestlint-formatstyle+7 | 99/100 | 14 days ago | |
| deifos/clipmira-subtitles.cursor/rules/frontend.mdc · 1 | Cursor rules | setuptestlint-formatstyle+7 | 99/100 | 14 days ago | |
| markstev/mark-starter.cursor/rules/frontend.mdc · 0 | Cursor rules | setuptestlint-formatstyle+6 | 99/100 | 14 days ago | |
| langflow-ai/langflow.cursor/rules/docs_development.mdc · 153k | Cursor rules | setupbuildtestlint-format+7 | 97/100 | 14 days ago | |
| bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow.cursor/rules/10-backend-python.mdc · 399 | Cursor rules | testlint-formatstylegit+4 | 97/100 | today |
A badge carrying the measured quality of the strongest agent config file in this repository, out of 100. It reads from this index every time somebody loads your page, so it changes when the measurement changes and there is nothing to keep up to date. Free, no account, and the value is not something you or we can set by hand.
[](https://rulestack.kynth.studio/configs/nota-america-forgecat-agent-profiles-profiles-awslabs-aidlc-workflows-for-cursor-cursor-rules-rule-core-workflow)Would rather not hotlink us? Every badge is also served in shields.io’s endpoint schema, so shields renders the image and your readers never talk to our domain:
Published by Toolproof, the masthead over this index and eight others. The method behind the number is at toolproof.kynth.studio/methodology, and the whole thing is readable as JSON with no key at /api.